FAQ  •  Register   •  Gallery •  Login

It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:42 am

Phono vs CDP

<<

MRHP

User avatar

TFM-75

Posts: 892

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:36 pm

Location: Buzzard Creek Ky

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:09 am

Phono vs CDP

Is it common for your phono stage to sound better/more realistic than your cd player?
TFM-75 serial #0001
PT-2400 serial #0001
Baby Black serial #0001
A Lightstar or two
Cherry/260's
Carver 490t
Sunfire Tube preamp
ProJect TT Tube preamp
DENON DP-62L TurnTable
Dual CS5000 Turn Table
DQ-20's
Douglas Cables
OK ERIC, LET GO OF THE MOUSE AND BACK AWAY FROM YOUR PC WITH YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR. NOW SLOWLY LAY FACE DOWN ON THE FLOOR!!!! - Snoop65
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:41 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

MRHP wrote:Is it common for your phono stage to sound better/more realistic than your cd player?

Imho yes. There is just something special about turntables. They seem to create a better sense of space.
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

TNRabbit

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7 TUBE AMPs

Posts: 13312

Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:53 am

Location: TN Native Languishing in VA

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:54 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

I've heard home-recorded CDs made from an LP that sound EXACTLY like the LP did (that sense of space). SO, IMO, the fault with commercially recorded CDs is that they fuck something up in the process...
TNRabbit
Image

From FrankieD's lips to your ears: Sunfire - a quiet box of endless power.

Sunfire TG-IV/400~7 Amp
Carver SD/A-360 CDP
Benchmark DAC-1
Sony SACD/DVD-A
Active bi-amp: Ashly XR-1001 & 2 Rane PEQ-15s
Main: HotRodded AL-IIIs
Sub: Klipsch RT-12d
Center: Sunfire CRS-3c
Surround: Sunfire CRS-3 (x 2)

OconeeOrange wrote:"Gary likes to play it 'loud' as do I. His system begs you turn it up until you die"

RIP WIlliam B. Dibble, 1948-2012. I'll miss you my friend.
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:11 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

Interesting thought Rabbit. I have plenty of quality home made Cd's. I never thought about comparing them against the record because I made them for listening in my car. Have to sit down and check that out.
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:23 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

I have to say though I have a few albums on both cd and record and its not that the cd recording was bad it was just the record sounded better. I know what you mean about poorly recorded cds. There are some out there that just sound terrible.
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

frankieD

Frankie The Mouth

Posts: 2450

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:38 pm

Location: So Cal

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:20 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

Snoop65 wrote:I have to say though I have a few albums on both cd and record and its not that the cd recording was bad it was just the record sounded better. I know what you mean about poorly recorded cds. There are some out there that just sound terrible.



Hey Snoop, try mking a CD from a record of an album you have on CD & compare the two CD's. See if the one you mastered (from LP) sounds different/better than the one you bought.

I think you may find that they are different.

Just my .02
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:06 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

frankieD wrote:
Snoop65 wrote:I have to say though I have a few albums on both cd and record and its not that the cd recording was bad it was just the record sounded better. I know what you mean about poorly recorded cds. There are some out there that just sound terrible.



Hey Snoop, try mking a CD from a record of an album you have on CD & compare the two CD's. See if the one you mastered (from LP) sounds different/better than the one you bought.

I think you may find that they are different.

Just my .02

That's a good idea too!!! :D
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

MRHP

User avatar

TFM-75

Posts: 892

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:36 pm

Location: Buzzard Creek Ky

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

Very interesting, I can see where the recording may fall short. I have an album on disc and lp and I did an A/B on them, the lp walked away the clear winner.

Will the 490t record a cd? Ive never even thought about it.
TFM-75 serial #0001
PT-2400 serial #0001
Baby Black serial #0001
A Lightstar or two
Cherry/260's
Carver 490t
Sunfire Tube preamp
ProJect TT Tube preamp
DENON DP-62L TurnTable
Dual CS5000 Turn Table
DQ-20's
Douglas Cables
OK ERIC, LET GO OF THE MOUSE AND BACK AWAY FROM YOUR PC WITH YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR. NOW SLOWLY LAY FACE DOWN ON THE FLOOR!!!! - Snoop65
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:16 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

MRHP wrote:Very interesting, I can see where the recording may fall short. I have an album on disc and lp and I did an A/B on them, the lp walked away the clear winner.

Will the 490t record a cd? Ive never even thought about it.

Nope. Its just a player.
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

Snoop65

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7t's

Posts: 2021

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:04 pm

Location: A galaxy far far away

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:19 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

I use a Alesis Masterlink ML-9600 to record Cd's.
CARVER LIGHTSTAR REFERENCE+SUNFIRE CLASSIC TUBE PREAMPLIFIER+JBL XPL200+MUSIC HALL MMF-9.1+GRADO REFERENCE MASTER 1+CARVER SD/A 390t=WOW!!!!!!
<<

frankieD

Frankie The Mouth

Posts: 2450

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:38 pm

Location: So Cal

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:40 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

I have an Harmon Kardon CD recorder that accepts analog input (as well as digital).

The LP's I've recorded onto CD's sound exactly (to me) the same as the vinyl versions.

The good is the vinyl sound & convenience...the bad is the hiss & pops.
<<

angelod307

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 2708

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:56 pm

Location: manning, sc

Post Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:14 pm

Re: Phono vs CDP

bob thought the same thing with early cd mastering. so, he inventended the digital time lens to help. look up in the owners manual for the digital time lens, and it will give you some insight on what is going on.
CarverFest: I just go for the arts and crafts
<<

F1nut

User avatar

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4548

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 3:31 am

Location: The Mars Hotel

Post Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:53 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

Well, the problem with early CD mastering is that they weren't mastered for CD. They simply used the RIAA EQ'd masters, so it's no wonder the CD's lacked with the lack of bass being the most noticeable.

I've heard plenty of really crappy LP's and really crappy CD's. I've also heard some pretty good LP's and CD's, but the inherent flaws related to LP's, regardless of their sound quality, still remain. Thankfully there are plenty of excellent sounding CD's and SACD's available these days for my listening pleasure. Having a CD or CD/SACD player that uses tubes in the output stage is a must, IMO.

This may interest some. David Manley (of VTL and Manley tube gear fame) was asked to demo and provide his opinion of the first CD player (Philips, IIRC). He wasn't too keen on it until he added tubes to the output. He said at that time (early 80's) that it sounded just as good as vinyl without the inherent flaws.
Political Correctness...defined

A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.



In a recent press conference, President Obama remarked, "If I had a city, it would look just like Detroit."
<<

tinpan

User avatar

TFM-45

Posts: 577

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:48 am

Location: Spotsylvania, VA

Post Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:27 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

It is so nice when you find a piece of music that you like that is recorded well in either format.
Tinpan

HT - Sunfire TG IV, Sunfire Cinema Grand Sig. 400 x 5, Oppo 93, Klipsch LaScala (3), Cornwalls (2), SW-12, Sony 60" LCD

2 channel - AN L2 Pre-amp, AN Interstage Mono Blocks 300b PSE, AN 2.1 DAC, Oppo DV-981HD, Lowther PM4a/Azurahorn/SentryIV

2 channel - AN L3 Signature Line stage, AN Interstage Mono Blocks 300b PSE, AN Sig. DAC 3.1 , AN Sig. Phono Stage, Sota Comet TT, Altec A5's

2 channel - empty, Klipschorns

2 channel - Audio Note Kit 1 300b SET, Audio Note DAC 2.1, Altec A4's
<<

helicopterpilotdoug

User avatar

SILVER-7t

Posts: 1923

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm

Location: Austin TX

Post Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:31 am

Re: Phono vs CDP

Whoever posted that CD vs LP video yesterday please re-post the link. That was so funny!!
Sunfire: Theater Grand IV, Cinema Grand Signature.
Carver: TFM-45, PST-24 Cassette, Extra Carver Gear: CT-6, C-11 (S/N 00001).
Polk Audio: Mains SRS 2.1TL, Center CSiA6, Surrounds FXiA6 and FXiA4, Sub DSW MicroPro 1000, Extra Speakers SDA 2A, SDA 2Btl, Monitor 10A.
Turntable: Dual CS 714Q
Bluray/SACD: Oppo BDP 83SE
CD: Sony 330 300 Disk changer

http://www.douglasconnection.com
Next

Return to Misc. Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB © 2011 phpBB Group.